Modeling of functional preparedness of women 25-35 years of different somatotypes

Background and Study Aim. The level of functional preparedness the population is influenced by many factors. greatest influence exerted economic condition country, climatic features region, food quality, environmental factor, social status population. Therefore, readiness standards should be updated periodically. For an objective assessment readiness, all energy potential considered: aerobic, anaerobic lactatic alactatic. Women different somatotypes have significant differences in degree development indicators preparedness. Hypothesis. models developed us for women will clearly demonstrate representatives somatotypes. aim study to develop aged 25-35 somatotypes.
 Material methods. involved years (n = 392). Somatotype was determined subjects. power aerobic supply processes method bicycle ergometry according PWC 170 test. threshold metabolism test with a stepwise increasing load. capacity muscular activity ergometric 60-second alactatic Wingate tests WAnT 30 10. Standards were author's based on rule 3?.
 Results. Functional been full range regimes. Models developed.
 Conclusions. are modern experimental data consider human (aerobic, alactatic). cannot universal countries even regions large countries.
 show difference from set without somatotype. considered when assessing